“Been Very Honest About Concerns With Pak” Over Terrorist Safe Havens: US

Washington: The US has been very honest about its concerns with Pakistan for an extended time about the terrorist safe havens along side the border areas of Afghanistan, the Pentagon has said Afghanistan and therefore the US have criticised Pakistan within the past for allowing Taliban fighters to cross into Pakistan where they’re provided safe havens and also receive medical treatment.

“We’ve been very honest about our concerns with Pakistan for an extended time, about the safe havens that exist on their side of the border along that spine. and people concerns are still valid today,” Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby said on Thursday at a press conference As Afghanistan’s neighbour, Pakistan certainly has equities and responsibilities with reference to terrorism therein a part of the planet , Mr Kirby said.

“We still have candid conversations with Pakistani leaders about our concerns,” he said in response to an issue “I think it is vital to still remind that the Pakistani people, likewise, are rendered victim by terrorist threats that emanate from those groups and along that very same border,” he said.

While Kabul claims that Islamabad is sending thousands of militants to fight within the war-ravaged country and providing shelter for the Taliban, Pakistan alleges that Afghanistan harbours the anti-Pakistani group Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan — the Pakistani Taliban — and also the secessionist Balochistan Liberation Army Mr Kirby also said that the us is within its rights to continue drone strikes inside Afghanistan.

“We believe we’ve the authorities that we’d like to still protect the state ,” he said The Taliban has accused the US of violating the withdrawal agreement by continuing to fly drones over Afghanistan and warned Americans against doing that within the future We have the authorities that we’d like to still defend our interests and therefore the security of the American people there and round the world, and we’re getting to do this ,” John Kirby said.

“Over-the-horizon operations don’t always need to include unmanned aerial assets, and that they don’t. That we use unmanned aerial assets clearly is true, and therefore the Secretary (of Defence) cited one that was just every week or two ago in Syria. But over-the-horizon doesn’t need to mean unmanned. It doesn’t even always need to mean aviation,” he said.